Markets enter Friday with risk assets leaning higher, volatility contained, and conviction once again conditional on policy rather than price.

Thursday’s rebound was driven by two forces that do not often coexist: a cooler inflation print that re-opened the rate-cut conversation, and earnings validation from Micron that re-anchored the AI trade in physical demand rather than narrative momentum.

But the overnight impulse did not come from the U.S.

The Bank of Japan’s decision to raise rates to a three-decade high has reintroduced global yield gravity into a market that had grown comfortable pricing synchronized easing. 

Japan is tightening as the U.S. debates cuts. Europe is pausing. The result is policy divergence at a moment when liquidity is thinning into year-end.

Relief has arrived. Conviction has not.

I’ve never been more nervous to hit “send.”

What I’m about to share could destroy my standing in crypto.

Critics will say I’ve lost it. Some colleagues may walk away.

But I don’t care.

I uncovered something so important about the 2025 crypto market that I stopped everything and wrote a book about it — a roadmap to what I believe could be the biggest wealth opportunity of the decade.

The evidence is so strong, I’m giving the entire book away for free.

If I’m right, this will change how you see crypto forever.

Claim your FREE copy before I change my mind.

The rate cut itself barely registered. Markets had priced it for weeks.

What mattered was the internal architecture around it. Dot dispersion widened. Officials spoke with less unity. Some leaned toward patience, others warned against complacency. The message was not confusion, but conditionality.

Bond markets understood this immediately. Long-end yields remained elevated even as the front end eased, signaling that the constraint was no longer the policy rate. It was credibility, fiscal supply, and term premium. Markets were no longer trading the Fed’s actions in isolation. They were trading the framework.

This is why yields rose after cuts. It is why housing remained constrained. And it is why equity multiples stopped expanding automatically.

Policy support was still present. Policy certainty was not.

The most consequential policy development of the week was barely framed as one.

The Federal Reserve resumed Treasury bill purchases, officially to manage reserves and smooth year-end funding. Markets did not hear stimulus. They heard stabilization.

T-bill demand allowed the Treasury to lean more heavily on the front end while easing pressure on longer-dated issuance. Repo markets calmed. Funding stress receded. Liquidity did not surge, but tail risk diminished.

This mattered because it reduced the probability of an accident without reigniting excess. Volatility compressed not because risk was embraced, but because system stress was reduced.

The market treated this as infrastructure, not fuel. And it priced assets accordingly.

The AI trade did not collapse. It matured.

For the first time in months, capital began distinguishing between ambition and execution. Oracle’s data-center financing questions and Broadcom’s margin sensitivity forced the market to confront timing, not just scale. Hyperscale narratives were no longer sufficient on their own.

Micron changed the tone because it delivered proof. Revenue, margins, and guidance tied directly to AI workloads reframed the conversation away from spending promises and back toward throughput.

The result was not a sector exit. It was discrimination.

High-multiple infrastructure names stalled. Balance-sheet-intensive plays were repriced. Companies with near-term earnings visibility were rewarded. The AI theme remained intact, but it was no longer insulated from scrutiny.

Narrative dominance gave way to operational validation.

The world's wealthiest individuals are making huge moves with their money.

Warren Buffett just liquidated billions of shares. Bill Gates sold 500,000 shares of Microsoft. Jeff Bezos filed to sell Amazon shares worth $4.8 billion.

What is going on? One multi-millionaire believes they are preparing for a catastrophic event. But not a crash, bank run, or recession. It’s something we haven’t seen in America for more than a century. 

For the full story, click here.

Despite multiple down sessions, the market never behaved as though it feared recession.

The Dow held up. Small caps participated intermittently. Equal-weight indices remained resilient. Defensive sectors outperformed quietly, but cyclicals did not collapse. This was not de-risking. It was redistribution.

Capital moved toward balance sheets, cash flow, and policy visibility. It moved away from leverage, duration, and deferred payoff structures. The market narrowed its tolerance rather than its exposure.

This distinction matters.

Volatility rose from compressed levels but failed to cascade. Volume stayed light. Positioning adjusted without forced selling. The system absorbed stress rather than amplifying it.

Markets were not asking whether growth survives. They were asking where it deserves a premium.

The Bank of Japan’s rate hike was not large. Its implication was.

As Japan tightened, the U.S. debated cuts and Europe paused. The era of synchronized easing officially ended. Yield gravity returned to the global system at an inconvenient moment, as liquidity thinned into year-end.

Currency markets responded first. The yen weakened despite higher rates, reflecting skepticism around the tightening path. The dollar firmed selectively. Commodities responded unevenly.

This divergence did not break markets, but it reintroduced relative constraints. Capital had to care again about where policy was heading, not just that it was easing somewhere.

Energy geopolitics reinforced the same theme. Enforcement against Venezuelan shipments tightened rhetoric without disrupting supply. Frozen Russian assets became fiscal tools rather than abstractions. Policy continued to shape flows at the margin rather than through shock.

Global risk was not escalating. It was fragmenting.

The most consistent signals of the week came from behavior, not news.

Gold and silver held near record levels, reflecting hedging rather than fear. Oil broke lower on demand concerns, not geopolitics, reframing energy from inflation hedge to growth tell. Volatility remained contained despite heavy narrative flow.

Equities told a bifurcated story. The Nasdaq absorbed pressure. The Dow remained resilient. Breadth narrowed without breaking.

Crypto struggled to reassert momentum even as risk assets stabilized, reinforcing the theme that liquidity was selective rather than abundant.

Across markets, the pattern repeated. Capital did not flee. It recalibrated.

The Original Magnificent Seven Produced 16,894% Average Returns Over 20 Years.

But the Man Who Called Nvidia at $1.10 Says "AI's Next Magnificent Seven Could Do It Even Faster."

See His Breakdown of the Seven Stocks You Should Own Here.

Last week was not about discovering something new. It was about confirming what had quietly changed.

Policy support remains, but credibility now carries weight. Liquidity exists, but it flows through structure rather than slogans. AI remains a driver, but execution matters. Rotation reflects preference, not panic. Global policy is diverging again, even as growth holds.

Markets are ending the year not with fear, but with discipline.

The rally is intact. The tolerance for assumption is not.

What matters going forward is not whether the system holds, but where it proves durable under scrutiny. Last week made clear that the market has begun asking that question again.