If today had a mood, it was one of fatigue tempered by realism. The Dow plunged ~0.5%; the S&P slid ~0.3%, and the Nasdaq barely held — down ~0.1%. Gold, which carried sentiment all week, gave back ~2.5% after its parabolic run, and oil dropped ~1.7% as demand concerns reemerged. Inflation fears crept back in, and so did the realization that without fresh data or stimulus, this week has been less about strength and more about testing resilience.

The undercurrents were telling: tech names flickered under pressure following NVIDIA’s rumored spending cut rumors; small-cap names underperformed; and bond yields firmed. Fed minutes chatter and fresh remarks from NY Fed’s John Williams kept rate-cut hopes alive but framed them as conditional, not automatic. That fit the tape: a little risk taken off, a little premium burned, no real panic

It could single-handedly reshape the global order… dramatically increase U.S. power

…and trigger a massive American market boom the likes of which we haven’t seen in 75 years.

Get the details here now.

Spyglass posits that OpenAI is doing more than pushing GPTs… it's quietly orchestrating a rising tide strategy that pulls along a host of AI infrastructure plays (chips, data centers, orchestration tools). Their core thesis: OpenAI’s growth increasingly shifts the performance of the broader AI ecosystem, setting a narrative where anyone in its orbit looks like they’re catching the wave. 

The piece unpackages how this “rising tide” isn’t just about increasing AI adoption; it’s about shaping capital flows, narrative anchoring, and risk opacities. OpenAI influences which players get spotlighted, who gets capital, and which infrastructure bets receive wind beneath their wings. But this universe is vulnerable: if sentiment reverses or OpenAI stumbles, the entire ecosystem may starve without realizing how interdependent it's become.

For traders, the alert is clear: alignment with OpenAI’s direction should not blur discernment on fundamentals. Many names benefit only by proximity. The long-tail risk is that when the central node (OpenAI) wobbles, the basket of satellites may slide… especially those already priced for perfection. Think of this not as AI as a theme, but AI as an umbrella: if the umbrella tears, all shade-seeking names get burned.

In this episode of Faster, Please!, economist Carl Benedikt Frey walks host Jim Pethokoukis through a sobering reconceptualization of growth. He argues that history shows periods of stagnation are far more common than booms… and the real question is why progress stalls, not whether it will stall. He points to factors like diminishing returns on existing tech, regulatory drag, incumbent capture, and declining experimentation as structural brakes on growth. 

Frey doesn’t deny the excitement around AI or biotech, but warns that breakthroughs alone won’t override the inertia built into modern economies. He critiques how vested interests and regulatory institutions increasingly favor stability over risk-taking, and how exploration in new technological trajectories is thwarted by the way capital is allocated. His big thesis: To reaccelerate, societies need renewed pathways for experimentation and disruption, not just betting harder on existing tech stacks.

For investors and traders, Frey’s framing matters because we often treat the AI boom as automatic growth. But if structural limits (and not tech ceilings) are the binding constraints, then every policy misstep, every debt shock, and every regulatory choke point becomes a lever for reversal. The next market leg may not end because tech slows. It may derail where society’s growth scaffolding cracks first.

We just released a brand-new special report:

3 Stocks to DOUBLE This Year 

These stocks were pinpointed by the same AI-driven quant model that has already selected 407 double-digit winners.

After scanning 115 factors daily, the model’s top picks were then reviewed by an investor with 45 years of proven success — leading to the 3 stocks featured in this special report.

Click here to claim your free copy now.

The calendar is thin but important. The University of Michigan preliminary consumer sentiment hits 10 a.m. ET and is one of the few clean reads not blocked by the shutdown. In a market trading on mood, that single number can steer the open, especially for cyclicals, retailers, and rate-sensitive groups.

(Talk about a prime example of progress halted by structural problems…)

Beyond that, expect more Fed-speak digestion after today’s Williams interview and steady handicapping into the Oct 28–29 FOMC. Earnings pre-season color is trickling in, with focus on whether AI capex is paying through to margins, and whether higher tariff frictions and the shutdown start showing up in guidance.