Markets entered the day on optimistic footing, buoyed by rising momentum in tech (notably NVIDIA Corporation hitting a historic market-cap milestone) and the expectation of a forthcoming Federal Reserve rate cut. The AI-lead rally and earnings-season optimism helped lift the Nasdaq and tech-heavy names, while the S&P and Dow traded more cautiously.

Mid-session, the Fed delivered a 25 bps cut to bring the funds rate into the 3.75-4.00% range, fulfilling expectations, yet Chair Jerome Powell emphasized that another cut is “far from a foregone conclusion.” This comment dampened some of the upside, sending yields modestly higher and triggering a slight risk-off feel despite solid tech performance.

By the afternoon close, the market settled into a narrow mix: tech, energy, and industrials advancing, with the defensives leading the rest of the sectors into the red, and safe-haven assets like gold slipping further. With big earnings ( including a Microsoft buoyed by a fresh Open AI deal) still pending post-close, investors appeared to adopt a wait-and-see mode as the trigger for the next leg remains uncertain.

When a U.S. ally tried to tax ONE American energy company...

Trump didn't hesitate to issue a direct warning.

Now this same company is generating over $3 billion in operating income...

And partnering with the hottest AI stock on Wall Street.

Out of 23,281 publicly traded stocks, this is the ONLY one that meets all the "unicorn" criteria.

Discover the energy unicorn here

This impressive research piece from Sparkline Capital digs into the booming AI capital-spend cycle and flags a major warning for investors: the companies leading the charge now may not capture the rewards later.

Here’s the simple but uncomfortable question: what happens when the AI gold rush turns into a spending spree too big to sustain? Their research shows that the world’s tech giants — once paragons of asset-light efficiency — are suddenly spending like industrial conglomerates. Capex now eats up a third of revenue for some of the biggest names in tech, and the pace is accelerating faster than the profits are catching up.

Sparkline draws a historical parallel that should make investors wince: every major innovation boom, from railroads to telecom, went through a phase where the builders made the least money. The companies pouring billions into data centers, chips, and cloud infrastructure may be laying the groundwork for the next decade of innovation… but not necessarily for their own shareholders. As Sparkline puts it, there’s a fine line between visionary investment and empire-building.

For traders, the message is to separate the architects from the tenants. The narrative of “AI boom = endless upside” is certainly seductive, but this piece reminds us that capital cycles have a dark side. Heavy spending may elevate growth stories today, but can erode return potential later. That doesn’t mean abandon AI entirely, but it does argue for nuance: balance the high-flyers with value-insulated beneficiaries and keep conviction sizes thoughtful.

The narrative of “AI boom = endless upside” is seductive — but Sparkline reminds us that capital cycles have a dark side. Heavy spending may elevate growth stories today, but can erode return potential later. That doesn’t mean abandon AI entirely, but it does argue for nuance: balance the high-flyers with value-insulated beneficiaries and keep conviction sizes thoughtful.

On this episode of Odd Lots, veteran energy historian Daniel Yergin lays out a blunt post-mortem: the green energy pivot didn’t fail because of optimism… it stumbled because the rest of the world didn’t hit the reset-button economists expected. While renewables growth continues, the practical reality is that natural gas and even coal are having a revival, especially in Asia and regions where supply chains, infrastructure and financing lag the hype.

Yergin argues that what looks like a delay is actually structural inertia. Carbon-reduction goals collided with geopolitics, rising demand, production bottlenecks and investment cycles that span years, not quarters. He points out that power-plant lead times, gas-turbine manufacturing backlogs and scarcity in critical minerals are not “hiccups”; they’re the plumbing of an energy system undergoing redesign. In practice, that means the market is still pricing energy as if the transition were imminent, even while the transition itself remains mid-loop.

For market participants the takeaway is subtle but important: don’t treat the energy complex as yesterday’s story. The rally in oil, the sudden revival of LNG projects, the jump in coal by Asia… these aren’t throwbacks, they’re functional pieces of today’s reality-check. If you’re tilting portfolios, the winners may not be the obvious “green transition ETFs” but rather the firms supplying the old-and-new system alike: mining, turbines, grid upgrades, LNG terminals. The theme isn’t “transition-over” but “transition-in-progress.”

A controversial new law (S.1582) just gave a small group of private companies legal authority to create a new form of government-authorized money.

Today, I can reveal how to use this new money… why it's set to make early investors' fortunes, and what to do before the wealth transfer begins on November 18 if you want to profit.

Go here for details now — while you still have time to position yourself.

Markets finished mixed after the Fed’s expected quarter-point cut, leaving traders in a holding pattern ahead of tomorrow’s data gauntlet. It was a day of trimming, not conviction, as investors digested the first real policy shift since summer.

Tomorrow brings the real test: the Q3 GDP advance estimate and the Fed’s preferred PCE inflation gauge hit before the open, offering the first post-cut verdict on whether the soft-landing story still flies. A hot print could snap yields higher and sour the risk tone; a mild one could hand bulls their next leg up.

Amazon’s earnings tomorrow will add a fresh spark to that uncertainty. The stock has become a proxy for how deep the AI and cloud boom really runs… and whether record capex across tech is still paying off or beginning to weigh. The truth is that any sign of cloud deceleration or margin compression could ripple across the entire mega-cap complex. Alongside that, Bristol-Myers Squibb’s results offer a quiet counterweight: health care’s steadiness versus tech’s volatility. Together they’ll decide if Friday opens with another relief rally, or a reminder that not all giants are built for soft landings.